Camp Lejeune cancer lawsuit

A Military Coverup Made The Camp Lejeune Water Contamination Problem Much Worse

Millions of Camp Lejeune Marines and their families may have been saved from getting sick had the Marine Corps been forthcoming with a warning

Tuesday, October 10, 2023 - The mishandling of information by the military regarding Camp Lejeune drinking water contamination is a deeply troubling and well-documented case of institutional negligence that exposed military personnel and their families to hazardous chemicals for decades. The US military stands accused in more than 1100 Camp Lejeune water lawsuits of covering up what they knew about the water contamination problem they had on the base. The government's deeply disturbing response to the environmental catastrophe that we find ourselves facing today is at the core of the legal action that is being taken. One disturbing element of the government's negligence is its repeated and flagrant disregard for water quality standards despite clear warnings. Moreover, the government stands accused of withholding critical information from their own scientific experts., This deception led investigations astray for nearly a decade and necessitated retroactive research to assess the extent of contamination. When the government's coverup was revealed, the military had no choice other than to overturn the statute limiting the time one had to file a lawsuit against them. The Camp Lejeune Justice Act is designed to right the wrongs perpetrated by the military that put millions of US Marine and civilian workers and their families at risk of developing cancer or Parkinson's disease from the seemingly innocent act of drinking the local water. This incident, which occurred at the U.S. Marine Corps base in North Carolina, involved the presence of toxic substances such as trichloroethylene (TCE) and perchloroethylene (PCE) in the base's drinking water. Expert sources have shed light on several key aspects of how the military mishandled this critical issue.

A lack of transparency and delayed action was a glaring problem. Dr. Richard Clapp, a renowned expert in environmental health from Boston University's School of Public Health, has highlighted that the military failed to promptly disclose information about the contamination, leaving those affected in the dark for an extended period. This lack of transparency allowed the exposure to continue unchecked. Secondly, there were issues related to scientific assessments and risk communication. Dr. Phil Brown, a professor of sociology and environmental studies at Northeastern University, has emphasized that the military downplayed the risks associated with the contaminated water, failing to communicate the gravity of the situation to the affected personnel and their families. This inadequate risk communication hindered individuals from taking necessary precautions. Thirdly, the military's internal investigations and data management were deeply flawed. Dr. Brown further points out that the military's internal inquiries often fell short of addressing the contamination adequately. Critical information was not properly managed or disseminated, and there were instances where evidence of the contamination was either ignored or mishandled. The Marine Corps's negligence resulted in significant harm to the health and well-being of military personnel and their families who were exposed to toxic chemicals in their drinking water. Hundreds of thousands of Camp Lejeune Justice Act claims have been and continue to be filed as Marines seek justice.">

Information provided by CampLejeuneJusticeActClaim.com, a website devoted to providing news about Camp Lejeune Justice Act Claim, including a free no-cost, no-obligation Camp Lejeune Justice Act Claim.

More Recent Camp Lejeune Water Lawsuit News:

View all Camp Lejeune Justice Act Claim News

No-Cost, No-Obligation Claim Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Developed Cancer After Spending 30 Days or More at Camp Lejeune between 1953 and 1988

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $2.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won over $300 million in four to date and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.


Privacy Notice: This site uses cookies for advertising, analytics and to improve our site services. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. For more information, see our cookie and privacy policy.